Opensource tools in the professional software space are really taking off, be it Blender or GIMP or even the humble LibreOffice. Krita on the other hand is generally accepted as an user-friendly GIMP alternative which is also cross-platform. Krita, which was launched about 9 years ago, is now considered to be as reliable as the best industry has to offer.
University Paris 8 adopts Krita, ditches Photoshop
The ATI (Art and Technology of Image) department at University Paris 8 is switching over to Krita this year, primary reason being the immense cost benefits that Krita has over costly proprietary alternatives such as Adobe’s Photoshop.
This department has the double aim to train students both to use graphic software (2D,3D,VFX and Compositing) and to code their own (Python, C#, C++). Until recently the classes used only Adobe Photoshop, but because of inadequate support from the company the department decided to replace that, according to Krita.
In an interview with Libre Graphics World, University Paris 8′s François Grassard, the man behind the department’s switch-over to Krita, confirms that their budget is indeed the primary reason for choosing Krita over Photoshop.
“Our university is among public schools that are mostly free in France, except registration fees that are pretty acceptable in comparison to fees in some other countries. To acquire all licenses of software that we teach, we have to rely on our own budget only. And our budget is ridiculously low. So we always have to talk to software vendors about the price of licenses.”
“Some companies are pretty fair with us, and we can, for instance, buy all Maya licenses we need. In other cases, companies can’t lower the price of their products. That was the case for Adobe. We asked for a discount, they said they can’t do that. End of the story.” So instead of simply using a cracked version of Adobe Photoshop, the team decides to give Krita a chance.
Enter Krita, the power-packed opensource Photoshop alternative
After being introduced to Krita by an industry expert, students at ATI were mostly impressed by the capabilities of the software, says Grassard. Of course, it’s not so easy to learn new software when you have used Photoshop for such a long time. But they decides to give it a go anyway.
“As the result, we switched from Photoshop to Krita. We didn’t do it for some kind of revolutionary ideology, we did it to continue using high quality software, and Krita was the best option. I think it’s going to be a pretty good experience for everybody at ATI. And we know that a lot of other animation schools in France are watching us.”
Story behind Blender and Natron
Blender is a well-know free and opensource 3D modelling & graphics software widely used for making animated movies while Natron is an opensource compositing software. Unlike Krita, the most students at ATI were already quite familiar with Blender. So the choice of this software came naturally from our students, says Grassard. He himself being an ardent user of Blender 3D graphics software, the choice of Blender was pretty straight forward.
After Effects was the primary software of choice for introducing compositing to students at ATI. But after the switch from Photoshop to Krita, they had to find a new one. Then they came to know about open source compositing software named Natron, which apparently was built by a French team at INRIA lab. And the rest, as they say, is history.
Commendable courage and determination shown here by the students as well as their mentor at ATI. We wish them the very best. Read his full interview at Libre Graphics World.